Sunday, May 8, 2011

jennette mccurdy so close

jennette mccurdy so close. According to Jennette, she is
  • According to Jennette, she is



  • product26
    Apr 25, 12:58 PM
    BlackBook Pro? *fingers crossed*





    jennette mccurdy so close. 3 movie jennette mccurdy
  • 3 movie jennette mccurdy



  • cubbie5150
    Feb 11, 11:47 AM
    It IS a nice gesture... I had to uninstall it as it doesn't seem to play nice w/ Cyber Duck (app simply won't open w/ Sophos installed)....haven't run into chatter about that issue, so maybe something unique to me [shrug]





    jennette mccurdy so close. Close jennette mark mccurdy,
  • Close jennette mark mccurdy,



  • Mr. Gates
    Mar 23, 04:44 PM
    Looks like I have a new $#!T List





    jennette mccurdy so close. So Close Jennette Mccurdy Chipmunk Version With Lyrics - VidoEmo - Emotional Video Unity
  • So Close Jennette Mccurdy Chipmunk Version With Lyrics - VidoEmo - Emotional Video Unity



  • infidel69
    Apr 14, 05:36 PM
    Glad to hear it:D

    Im really stoked to see the Ivy Bridge benchmarks...the i72600k blew my mind:eek: I feel bad for the enthusiast folks who bought a 980x :(

    Enthusiasts had the 980 for atleast 6 months now and it's still faster than any sb cpu. Alot of those guys already had x58 mobo's anyway. Now if you purchased a brand new 12 core Mac Pro then then I agree with you.





    jennette mccurdy so close. JENNETTE McCURDY
  • JENNETTE McCURDY



  • nospleen
    Sep 10, 08:29 AM
    My point as just that if intel doubles the number of cores every 6th month, I believe that lifespan of a Mac is going to be substantially shorter. I doubt that the people who just bought a new MacPro realized that their computer would be as fast as an "entry level" computer within a year. Old Macs, like my own MDD, will be deemed to live in a time-bubble with now means of interacting with newer computers.
    Things have certainly changed after the PPC ->x86 transition.

    I am not quite following you. It is not as if your mac will slow down because the new one has more cores? Or, are you saying the requirements to run the software will increase at a faster rate because the hardware is improving so rapidly, thus dating your mac prematurely?





    jennette mccurdy so close. 2009 - Jennette McCurdy - So
  • 2009 - Jennette McCurdy - So



  • leroypants
    Apr 19, 10:34 AM
    If Samsung breached the supply contract, they would be sued again. The difference is that in the infringement suit, Apple has a moderate case and the remedy if they win will be $100M-$2B range. In a contract infringment, Apple would have an ironclad case, and the remedy would be $100B-$300B-- in other words, Samsung would become a division of Apple.

    Could you please link the contract (since you seem to know everything about it), and out of curiosity where did you get your law degree?





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette McCurdy
  • Jennette McCurdy



  • Zoboomafoo
    Sep 13, 10:39 PM
    Not what i was looking for
    I wanted a smart phone wheres the keyboard ?
    i can buy an itunes phone right now from cingular but i dont want one
    what makes them think i will buy one now because its from apple and not motorola

    There's a number of reasons why the non-smart phone route is best.

    1) try to do one thing and do it well. the ipod is great because it does one thing very well.
    2) start from the bottom and build up.
    3) it's always easier to add a feature than it is to take one away.

    who knows, we'll see when/if it comes out. i tend to not like phones that have sliders.





    jennette mccurdy so close. Teen star Jennette McCurdy del
  • Teen star Jennette McCurdy del



  • ~Shard~
    Aug 31, 11:48 AM
    I've been putting off a new mac for YEARS! Gief Core Duo 2 iMacs!

    Yep, that would be nice! Being that Apple touts the iMac as being their "flagship model" in many respects, you think that they would ensure it is always as up to date and competitive as possible. I think a Conroe iMac would be great, but perhaps Apple is holding off due to a redesign. I don't know how much they could change the iMac, or if they'd want to right now but who knows...





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette McCurdy
  • Jennette McCurdy



  • InuNacho
    Apr 25, 12:55 PM
    The only thing I can think of is the removal of the optical drive.





    jennette mccurdy so close. jennette mccurdy zoey 101
  • jennette mccurdy zoey 101



  • Stella
    Oct 27, 07:57 AM
    Apple are trying to improve, which is a Good Thing.

    However, bad publicity involving non Green companies is always a good thing. Shame companies into making their products 'greener' - which effectively what happened to Apple.

    One World. We aren't getting off this rock any time soon.





    jennette mccurdy so close. close,jennette mccurdy
  • close,jennette mccurdy



  • mattsh
    Aug 29, 06:41 AM
    As stated earlier in this thread, this is absolutely not true. The MacPros are included in the rebate and they were NOT available when the promotion started. They were added as elgible purchases after release.

    Its almost 7:30 EST, and the store is still up. Not a good sign for action today.

    --HG


    Ok well I stand corrected then. Keep in mind.. the store doesn't "open" until 8am EST... So we still have 20 minutes :P





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jenette McCurdy
  • Jenette McCurdy



  • mlrproducts
    Sep 13, 11:26 PM
    MR should be happy, as it seems there are plenty of new, naive and ignorant noobs running around.

    1) Read the darned article before you spout off about "well hows'I gonnda call wichout me dile pad?"

    2) There is a slim to none change this will be any type of smart phone. Scratch that, there is no chance. I would post numbers but I don't have to, because anyone with common sense could put together that the number of non-smart phones outsell smart phones to about a billion to one. (However aside from the obvious mp3/aac playing abilities, it will be "enhanced" in the sense that it will have bluetooth and sync seamlessly with iSync.)

    3) Touchscreen would be nice, but it seems as if Apple's patents never materialize. That, and 3b) any type of touch device [that already gets skin/hair oil on it] would be too dirty with fingerprints all over it.

    4) Quit complaining about a slider. 4b) They are popular (which for the economically challenged=they sell well=more money for Apple). Also, I would ask that you really think about how often you use your "most recently dialed" list or phonebook vs. new numbers.

    5) Technically the artist's rendition is not "nano-like," it is now "vintage retro-1st gen nano-like." ;)

    6) While I don't want to challenge Arn's sources, it would be difficult to make the back true "chrome" as the iPods, due to signal issues (unless an external antenna was used, which is unlikely based on a whole slew of reasons I won't go into).

    7) The phone will more than likely be GSM. You MIGHT get a CDMA version poor other folks, but not likely (and if so, perhaps only carried on Verizon, and not at release).

    8) And #7 leads to real issues re: business. These include: will Apple become a virtual carrier, will the release the phone GSM unlocked and only Apple branded, will it be produced by another manufacturer (ie: Samsung) and attributed as such (unlikely), or are they going to go with the obvious Cingular release (and the possibility of adding to T-Mobile after a Cingular exclusive period). Lastly, worldwide release/availability issues.

    EDIT:
    9) Quit asking about live iChat video chat, it AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN. A possible related item would be iChat texting (similar to current AOL, Yahoo, ICQ).





    jennette mccurdy so close. Featured on:Gallery: Jennette
  • Featured on:Gallery: Jennette



  • jamferma
    Sep 5, 01:28 AM
    :confused:

    What is this....

    www.apple.com/movies

    comes up with

    Forbidden

    You don't have permission to access /movies on this server.


    What might this mean





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette-mccurdy year old
  • Jennette-mccurdy year old



  • llama-man
    Sep 6, 07:21 AM
    I have just had confirmation of one of our suppliers that new iMacs are on the way next week. He didn't elaborate on the details though.

    Next week is gonna be expensive.





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette McCurdy
  • Jennette McCurdy



  • Dmac77
    Mar 23, 07:16 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Don't do it Apple!

    Seriously, apps like trapster have saved my ass from the doughnut eating porkers in my area (not DUI, rather speeding). Seriously don't give into the government, they just want the police to be able to slowly rape more and more of our rights and freedoms (including my right to do 75 on a empty back road if I want to).

    -Don





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette McCurdy (2009) Best
  • Jennette McCurdy (2009) Best



  • sartinsauce
    Oct 12, 12:43 PM
    They might as well add a Core 2 Duo Mac Book Pro too.


    I like your style. Nice and subtle. I almost overlooked your post.





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette McCurdy – She acts,
  • Jennette McCurdy – She acts,



  • ciTiger
    May 3, 11:15 AM
    For a desktop OS, sure.

    Ivy Bridge will bring it up to 3 displays. AMD has 6 displays for embedded systems now.





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette+mccurdy
  • Jennette+mccurdy



  • res1233
    Apr 30, 01:56 PM
    USB 3 is coming next year. The only reason Apple has yet to implement it is because Intel hasn't. But that will change in Ivy Bridge.

    Yep. There is little reason for Apple to fear USB 3. It's slower in both theoretical maximum speed and FAR slower in real world maximum speed. The only advantage is... Uhm... TB supports USB so... I guess there isn't one. Yes, I think USB 3 is quite possibly going to be the last iteration of USB.





    jennette mccurdy so close. Jennette+mccurdy+bio
  • Jennette+mccurdy+bio



  • IngerMan
    Apr 30, 07:39 PM
    Similar, but not the same. The new design came out in October 2009.

    New sizes, new aspect ratio, removal of plastic from the enclosure, removed the outer aluminum bezel, etc. And new guts, of course.

    Yes you are correct. After a little digging is was a considerable upgrade. Even though the look stayed close. I almost wish mine would take a bomb so I would upgrade.





    ChrisTX
    Apr 25, 06:44 PM
    Just purchased the latest refresh of the MacBook Pro to replace a a 2006 model, and couldn't be happier with my purchase. I had a hunch the next refresh would be a case redesign, still no regrets.





    Joe-Diver
    Mar 29, 11:08 AM
    Don't believe it!





    MagnusVonMagnum
    Apr 16, 05:58 PM
    Yeah, I said Thunderbolt would take over the world when I said that USB and Thunderbolt were complimentary. :rolleyes: Thunderbolt for high bandwidth, USB for low bandwidth.

    Yeah, super complex high speed adapters that we've seen done time and time again in an affordable manner. :rolleyes:

    Glad you're done arguing. Clearly you only had two points to try and refute and it would be embarrassing for you to just leave the rest of my previous post with no replies.

    No, it's more like I'd get banned if I really said what I thought. I'm clearly dealing with someone that knows very little about USB.





    stol
    Apr 11, 10:59 AM
    Both financially and from a space and energy consumption point of view, an Apple TV or an Airport Express is a more efficient solution for this. Apple tends to support only the efficient and simple solutions, not the cumbersome ones.

    Agreed. I never said that this is the most elegant solution.
    But� why should I get extra hardware (environmentally unfriendly) when I have my Mac on most of the time anyway. You know, I already have a computer (connected to speakers) so computer + Airport Express is more energy/money/space inefficient than a computer alone.


    You know all well that the router is not free, you pay for through your monthly payments. The fact that your provider does not offer a cheaper service without such hardware freebies is just unfortunate.

    If I renew my service, I pay the same money and of course I don't get new hardware. Hardware freebies are for new customers/connections in many services other than internet connections. Subscribe to a satellite tv service for example, get a free dish. This is beyond me anyway, it's a standard policy for all providers where I live. I just got this modem/router with my subscription and so far it works fine. No need to replace it.


    Would you be happy if Apple included a free Airport Express with all Macs (but naturally increased the price for the Mac)? There is nothing free, at least in the physical world (the digital world can be very close to free, see iOS apps).


    This makes no sense. Not everyone needs or desires an Airport Express. I never asked Apple for free hardware.


    So, how much do think Apple is asking for licensing their Airplay technology, I'd guess at most between $5-10.


    Do they license Airplay technology to software developers? I don't think so.
    Show me an app on the Mac App Store (or wherever) that acts like an Airport Express and i'll buy it at once.


    Is your Mac (the one connected to your sound system) really cheaper than an Airport Express?
    And if this is your only Mac, you can just use the Remote app to play the music on it from your iOS device.


    How can you possibly compare a Mac to� an Airport Express? I bought a Mac to have a COMPUTER not to stream music wirelessly.
    What you should think about is: How hard is for a Mac to act like an Airport Express with the proper software? It shouldn't.
    Why it there no software like this? Apple does not want to.
    Fair enough; It's their technology. Sometimes though, people want different things. Glad to see quite a few people here want the same as me.


    I have no idea what a Banana-TV is but for all that you want to do, an Airport Express it seems would do the trick. Is an Airport Express much more expensive than your Banana-TV?

    Banana TV is software. It is $7.99. It makes your Mac act like an Apple TV - does not support audio only though.
    It does something like: I can stream a video i just shot from my iPhone to my huge iMac screen - no AppleTV needed, no need to transfer the video to the iMac, no cables.
    Now tell me this is not a better solution for casual use than having an AppleTV in terms of money, space, energy, hardware. You see, I don't even have a TV!





    prady16
    Sep 5, 08:48 AM
    Probably just a minor update.....Don't expect a biiiig update without any formal announcement or a press conference!



    No comments:

    Post a Comment